Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co.

  • 83 F.2d 731
  • 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 2627
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Filed
May 6, 1936
Status
Published
Cited by
9 cases

The opinion

On Petition for Rehearing.

Charles Fahy, of Washington, D. C, and Robert B. Watts, of New York City, for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner asks us to reconsider our declaration that an enforcement petition must allege that the “cease and desist” order has been disobeyed. The history of the act in Congress, which is now before us for the first time, lends some color to *734 the contention that the respondent may be enjoined before he has any opportunity to compiy. What we said was not necessary to our decision and we shall regard the point as open, if it comes before us again.

Petition denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.