Opinion

Seiberling Rubber Co. v. Commissioner

  • 70 F.2d 651
  • 13 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1049
  • 1934 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9286
  • 13 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 1049
  • 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4251
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Filed
May 8, 1934
Status
Published
Author
Taylor
On the bench
Moorman, Taylor
Cited by
3 cases

The opinion

TAYLOR, District Judge

(dissenting).

I dissent from the result reached in this case because I believe petitioner should be given an opportunity to set up inter-company transactions which would reduce its apparent taxable income. It seems to me the disregarding of inter-company transactions by the taxpayer upon the idea that the affiliates would be treated as a unit by the Commissioner and later the Board of Tax Appeals has caused an inequitable result. The ease should, in my opinion, be reopened so that the tax returns may be made to reflect all inter-company transactions, particularly those now" reflected by the books of the affiliates, which would reduce the apparent income of petitioner.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.