Opinion

United States v. Field

  • 13 Ct. Cust. 552
  • 1926 CCPA LEXIS 41
Court
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Filed
Feb 25, 1926
Status
Published
Author
Bland
On the bench
Barber, Bland, Graham, Hatfield, Smith
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 67.8%

The opinion

BlaND, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The United .States has appealed from the judgment of the Board of General Appraisers (Chas. P. McClelland, G. A., dissenting), which sustained protests of importers to the assessment by the collector of duty on woolen bootees at 50 per centum ad valorem and 45 cents per pound under paragraph 1114 of the act of 1922, and which holds them to be dutiable under paragraph 1405.

*553 The merchandise consisted of woolen bootees wholly composed of wool yarn, knitted, and intended to coyer the feet of infants. The bootees had no defined soles.

The merchandise and the issues, as we understand it, are identical with those passed upon by this court in the case of United States v. Kahn & Co., 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 57 , T. D. 40881, wherein this court held paragraph 1405 covered “only such boots, shoes, and other footwear as were manufactured with uppers and soles, and that there should be on inspection some visible line of demarcation between such uppers and soles in each instance.”

Under the authority of the above case the judgment of the Board of General Appraisers is reversed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.