Opinion

Mecke v. United States

  • 12 Ct. Cust. 237
  • 1924 CCPA LEXIS 55
  • 1924 WL 26697
Court
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Filed
Jun 9, 1924
Status
Published
Author
Barber
On the bench
Baebee, Barber, Bland, Hateield, Maetin, Martin, Smith
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 15.8%

The opinion

CONCURRING OPINION BY

BARBER, JUDGE.

I concur in the result.

The fact of undervaluation being conceded, the mandate of the statute compels the collector to assess what is termed therein, additional duties, although they are not such in fact. —Helwig v. United States ( 188 U. S. 605 ).

As I view it, when undervaluation is established, as in this case, whether or not these so-called additional duties shall be levied, is not a question for the Board of General Appraisers.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.