Opinion

United States v. Bloomingdale Bros. & Co.

10 Ct. Cust. 149
1920 CCPA LEXIS 32

Court: Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Filed: May 1, 1920
Status: Published
Author: Barber
On the bench: Barber, Martin, Montgomery, Smith, Yries
Cited by: 37 cases

The opinion

CONCURRING OPINION.

Barber, Judge:

The importers have established that the classification of the collector was wrong. They have also established that the merchandise is dutiable under paragraph 252. Under the circumstances set forth in the court’s opinion I think the invoice possesses sufficient probative force to-justify the conclusion that the judgment of the Board of General Appraisers should be affirmed, but I query if the invoice possesses probative force to the extent that the opinion might seem to indicate.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.