Opinion

Katherine Steen v. The City of Detroit Detroit Election Commission Wayne County Board of Commissioners

  • 37 F.3d 1500
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 35026
  • 1994 WL 545325
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Filed
Oct 5, 1994
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 20.9%

The opinion

37 F.3d 1500

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

Katherine STEEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

The CITY OF DETROIT; Detroit Election Commission; Wayne

County Board of Commissioners, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-1205.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 5, 1994.

1

Before: GUY and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges, and McKEAGUE, District Judge. *

ORDER

2

Katherine Steen appeals a district court order dismissing her civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . The case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

3

Seeking monetary relief, Steen sued the City of Detroit, the Detroit Election Commission and the Wayne County Board of Commissioners, alleging that the defendants violated her right to vote when she was not permitted to cast a ballot in the 1992 general election. The district court concluded that Steen's complaint failed to state a claim and dismissed the case. Steen filed a motion for reconsideration, which the district court denied. Steen has filed a timely appeal.

4

Upon review, we conclude that the district court properly dismissed Steen's complaint for failure to state a claim. After construing the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and accepting all her factual allegations as true, it is clear that Steen undoubtedly can prove no set of facts in support of her claims that would entitle her to relief. Allard v. Weitzmen (In re DeLorean Motor Co.), 991 F.2d 1236, 1240 (6th Cir.1993). The district court properly dismissed the individual defendants in this case, as the record reflects that Steen never effectuated service upon these defendants and made them party to the suit. Further, the district court properly dismissed Steen's claims against the governmental entities, because she failed to allege a direct causal link between a municipal policy or custom and the alleged constitutional deprivation. Collins v. City of Harker Heights, Tex., 112 S.Ct. 1061, 1067-68 (1992).

5

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment for the reasons set forth in the district court's opinion and order filed on January 11, 1994. Rule 9(b)(3), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

*

The Honorable David W. McKeague, U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.