Opinion

Appeal of Mortenson

  • 3 B.T.A. 300
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Jan 14, 1926
Status
Published
Author
Trammell
On the bench
Ghaupnek, Green, Lansdon, Littleton, Love, Moeeis, Phillips, Smith, Teammell, Trammell
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 66.0%

The opinion

*301 OPINION.

Trammell

: The question involved in this appeal is whether a taxpayer may deduct as an ordinary and necessary expense a premium on a policy of insurance taken out by him on a vessel owned by a corporation of which he is a stockholder. While it is well settled that a stockholder in a corporation is not the owner of the property of the corporation, he does have an interest in the protection of the corporation’s property and would sustain a loss if the property were destroyed. To the extent that he would sustain a loss by the destruction of the corporation’s property, he has an insurable interest in the property. Aetna Insurance Co. v. Kennedy, 161 Ala. 600 ; 50 So. 73 . In the case of Riggs v. Commercial Mutual Insurance Co., 125 N. Y. 7 ; 25 N. E. 1058 , the question was directly presented to the Court of Appeals of New York as to whether a stockholder in a steamship company had an insurable interest in its steamers. The court, after careful consideration of the authorities, held that he had such an interest.

The corporation in this case, having failed to insure its steamer, left the interest of the taxpayer unprotected, and the expense incurred by him in protecting his interest and investment was an ordinary and necessary expense.

On reference to the Board, Green, Lansdon, Love, Littleton, Moeeis, and Smith dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.