Opinion

In re Piteo

  • 125 Ohio St. 3d 1421
  • 926 N.E.2d 312
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
May 12, 2010
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

On February 26, 2010, the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness filed its final report in this court pursuant to Gov.Bar R. I(12)(E), recommending that Theodore James Piteo’s application for admission to the Ohio bar be disapproved because he violated bar examination rules by returning to questions after time was called. No objections were filed. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that consistent with the recommendation of the board, the application of Theodore James Piteo for admission to the practice of law in Ohio is disapproved and that he be permitted to reapply for admission in July 2010 by filing a supplemental character questionnaire. Upon reapplication, Theodore James Piteo shall undergo review by the board, and upon a recommendation of approval by the board, he shall be admitted to the practice of law in Ohio.

Brown, C.J., not participating.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.