Opinion

Marc Glassman, Inc. v. Levin

  • 119 Ohio St. 3d 254
  • 893 N.E.2d 476
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Aug 5, 2008
Status
Published
Author
Pfeifer
On the bench
Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Stratton
Cited by
5 cases
Authority
More cited than 15.3%

The opinion

Pfeifer, J.,

dissenting.

{¶ 20} The transactions in this case are quite similar to the transactions held taxable in Quotron Sys., Inc. v. Limbach (1992), 62 Ohio St.3d 447 , 584 N.E.2d 658 . The Tax Commissioner concluded that Marc Glassman, Inc.’s “description of the services provided by NDC or Envoy are quite similar to internet access services [which are taxable when used in business], in that NDC and Envoy provided an electronic conduit through which information flowed from computers that they had access to by way of telecommunications equipment.” Nothing in the record convinces me otherwise. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Cupp, J., concurs in the foregoing opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.