Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Zins

  • 116 Ohio St. 3d 1
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Oct 10, 2007
Status
Published
Author
Donnell
On the bench
Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Stratton
Cited by
1 cases

The opinion

O’Donnell, J.,

dissenting.

{¶ 17} The conduct engaged in by respondent threatens the hard-working citizens in our state who are unwittingly exposed to identity theft and financial loss by a person in a position of trust. This type of individual is not fit to practice law and represent such citizens. It is the responsibility of this court to police the legal profession. Rather than readmit this respondent after a hiatus of only two years, I would impose an indefinite suspension, thereby making reentry conditioned on proven worthiness. Accordingly, I dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.