Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Young

113 Ohio St. 3d 36

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Mar 21, 2007
Status: Published
Author: Stratton
On the bench: Began, Connor, Consideration, Cupp, Donnell, Ended, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Rogers, Stratton, Third, Whose
Cited by: 3 cases

The opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

{¶ 35} I concur in the majority’s opinion and judgment, except that I would run the indefinite suspension concurrently with respondent’s current suspension, as I do not believe that the infraction, which was committed during the same time period as his previous misconduct, warrants the more severe sanction of consecutive time.

Jonathan E. Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel, and Brian E. Shinn, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

Murman & Associates and Michael E. Murman, for respondent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.