Opinion

A. Schulman, Inc. v. Wilkins

112 Ohio St. 3d 1208

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Dec 19, 2006
Status: Published
Author: Pfeifer
On the bench: Connor, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton
Cited by: 4 cases
Authority: More cited than 15.3%

The opinion

Pfeifer, J.,

dissenting.

{¶ 6} I continue to believe that a dual filing requirement such as that contained in R.C. 5717.04 should not be part of our rules. See Olympic Steel, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 110 Ohio St.3d 1242 , 2006-Ohio-4091 , 852 N.E.2d 178 , ¶ 4-5 (Pfeifer, J., dissenting). I believe this case should be heard on the merits. I dissent and would deny the motion to dismiss the appeal.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.