Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Bailey

  • 110 Ohio St. 3d 223
  • 852 N.E.2d 1180
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Sep 6, 2006
Status
Published
Author
Stratton
On the bench
Connor, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton
Cited by
3 cases

advising and instructing clients on how to complete and file documents with state bureau of motor vehicles to obtain relief from drivers’ license revocation

How later courts described this case

  • advising and instructing clients on how to complete and file documents with state bureau of motor vehicles to obtain relief from drivers’ license revocation

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

{¶ 23} I concur with the majority to the extent that the opinion adopts the board’s findings concerning respondent’s unauthorized practice of law. However, I respectfully dissent from the amount of the civil penalty imposed. Instead, I would impose a civil penalty of $1000 for each of the 14 violations documented by client files admitted into evidence at the hearing, for a total of $14,000.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.