Opinion

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Moesle

  • 106 Ohio St. 3d 475
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Nov 2, 2005
Status
Published
Author
Stratton
On the bench
Connor, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton
Cited by
2 cases

The opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

concurring.

{¶ 11} I write separately to explain my concurrence in the majority’s opinion. Normally, one incident giving rise to the charges in this complaint would not have warranted an indefinite suspension. But when a respondent fails to respond to the complaint, he leaves us little choice, as his conduct demonstrates a flagrant disregard for the disciplinary process. Therefore, I concur in the indefinite suspension.

Bruce A. Campbell, Bar Counsel, and Jill M. Snitcher McQuain, Assistant Bar Counsel; Schottenstein, Zox & Dunn and Bridgette C. Roman, for relator.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.