Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Insley

  • 104 Ohio St. 3d 424
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 15, 2004
Status
Published
Author
Stratton
On the bench
Connor, Donnell, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
Cited by
4 cases

The opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting.

{¶ 14} I dissent from the majority’s opinion. Because of the respondent’s lack of prior discipline and because respondent had no motive for personal gain, I would follow the recommendations of the board. I would suspend respondent for two years with one year stayed and impose the board’s recommended conditions.

F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.