Opinion

Campaign to Elect Larry Carver Sheriff v. Campaign to Elect Anthony Stankiewicz Sheriff

  • 101 Ohio St. 3d 256
  • 804 N.E.2d 419
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Feb 23, 2004
Status
Published
Author
Pfeifer
On the bench
Connor, Donnell, Moyer, Only, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
Cited by
13 cases
Authority
More cited than 15.3%

The opinion

Pfeifer, J.,

concurring in judgment only.

{¶ 20} I would not decide this case based on laches. See State ex rel. Ascani v. Stark Cty. Bd. of Elections (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 490, 495 , 700 N.E.2d 1234 (Pfeifer, J., concurring). See, also, State ex rel. Wolfe v. Delaware Cty. Bd. of *261 Elections (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 182, 186-187 , 724 N.E.2d 771 (Pfeifer, J., dissenting). I concur in judgment only because I would dismiss this case on the merits.

Mark Steven Colucci, for relators.

Linnen Co., L.P.A., and Jerome T. Linnen Jr., for respondents Anthony Stankiewicz and Campaign to Elect Anthony Stankiewicz Sheriff.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.