emphasizing that parole board may "consider any circumstances relating to the offense or offenses of conviction, including crimes that did not result in conviction, as well as any other factors [it] deems relevant"
How later courts described this case
- emphasizing that parole board may "consider any circumstances relating to the offense or offenses of conviction, including crimes that did not result in conviction, as well as any other factors [it] deems relevant"
- considering action against the Parole Authority for injunctive and declaratory relief
Written by the judges who cited it.
Distinguished
Distinguished by State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Oapa, Unpublished Decision (5-25-2004), 2004 Ohio 2648 (2004)
Specifically, the magistrate determined that the holding of Layne is inapplicable to relator's case, as he has not had a parole hearing since OAPA's March 1, 1998 adoption of the new parole guidelines.
The opinion
Cook, J.,
dissenting.
{¶ 30} Because I would decide these cases consistent with the reasoning expressed in Robertson v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., Franklin App. No. 01AP-1111, 2002-Ohio-4303 , 2002 WL 1935700 ,1 respectfully dissent.