Opinion

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Judge

  • 96 Ohio St. 3d 467
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Oct 2, 2002
Status
Published
Author
Cook
On the bench
Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 15.3%

The opinion

Cook, J.,

dissenting.

{¶ 7} We have already imposed an indefinite suspension upon the respondent for conduct similar to that involved in this case. See Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Judge (2002), 94 Ohio St.3d 331 , 763 N.E.2d 114 . Despite that sanction, the respondent continued to show a complete disregard for the disciplinary process and this court. As the majority itself acknowledges, this “cavalier attitude” of the respondent is an aggravating factor. I would accordingly disbar the respondent.

Gary S. Fishman; Fay, Sharpe, Fagan, Minnich & McKee, L.L.P., and Thomas Kocovsky, for relator.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.