Opinion

Board of Education v. Montgomery County Board of Revision

95 Ohio St. 3d 462
768 N.E.2d 1175

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Jun 12, 2002
Status: Published
On the bench: Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
Cited by: 1 cases
Authority: More cited than 66.2%

The opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of this court in case No. 2001-0948 is limited to addressing appellant’s Proposition of Law No. 4, which states:

{¶ 2} “A landlord and a tenant cannot file separate complaints against same property during the same interim period under R.C. 5715.19(A)(2).”

{¶ 3} The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals in case No. 2001-0948 is reversed on the authority of R.C. 5715.19(A)(2).

{¶ 4} The judgment of this court in case No. 2001-0949 is limited to addressing appellant’s Proposition of Law No. 2, which states:

{¶ 5} “A landlord and a tenant cannot file separate complaints against same property during the same interim period under R.C. 5715.19(A)(2).”

{¶ 6} The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals in case No. 2001-0949 is reversed on the authority of R.C. 5715.19(A)(2).

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer, J., concurs in part and dissents in part.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.