Opinion

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Cicirella

  • 94 Ohio St. 3d 224
  • 761 N.E.2d 1046
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Jan 30, 2002
Status
Published
Author
Cook
On the bench
Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
Cited by
3 cases

The opinion

Cook, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent. The majority’s imposition of an indefinite suspension inadequately takes into account such aggravating factors as respondent’s prior disciplinary offenses, her repeated failure to cooperate in the investigation of grievances, and her disregard for the orders of this court. See Rules and Regulations Governing Procedure on Complaints and Hearings Before the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, Section 10(B)(1), Guidelines for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions. I would disbar respondent.

Steven L. Gardner, Martha H. Krebs and Stanley E. Stein, for relator.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.