“[W]hen the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous and conveys a clear and definite meaning, * * * we rely only on what the General Assembly actually said.”
How later courts described this case
- “[W]hen the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous and conveys a clear and definite meaning, * * * we rely only on what the General Assembly actually said.”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Douglas, J.,
concurring. I concur in the well-reasoned opinion and judgment of the majority. While so doing I continue to adhere to my dissent in Gladon v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth. (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 312 , 662 N.E.2d 287 .