Opinion

Simmerer v. Dabbas

  • 89 Ohio St. 3d 586
  • 733 N.E.2d 1169
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Sep 6, 2000
Status
Published
Author
Pfeifer
On the bench
Cook, Douglas, Iiper, Moyer, Only, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney, Syllabus
Cited by
13 cases

denying unforeseeable damages resulting from negligent sterilization

How later courts described this case

  • denying unforeseeable damages resulting from negligent sterilization

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Pfeifer, J.,

concurring in syllabus and judgment only. I concur to make clear that the causal chain was too extended in this case for the negligent doctor to be liable for damages related to Steven Simmerer’s heart defect. However, if the Simmerers had sought a permanent sterilization in order to prevent the birth of a child who might be especially at risk for birth defects, I would hold differently. In that instance, I believe there would be enough of a direct link to the child’s condition that the doctor who negligently performed the sterilization procedure could be held liable.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.