Opinion

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Millonig

  • 84 Ohio St. 3d 403
  • 704 N.E.2d 568
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Jan 20, 1999
Status
Published
Author
Stratton
On the bench
Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
Cited by
5 cases

implying that the most serious violations of DR 1-102[A][4] involve dishonesty toward a client or court

How later courts described this case

  • implying that the most serious violations of DR 1-102[A][4] involve dishonesty toward a client or court

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. Failure to file income tax returns, whether or not tax is due, is a serious violation that deserves more than a public reprimand. Therefore, I would suspend respondent for one year, and would stay that suspension on the condition that during this stay no disciplinary complaints are certified to the board by a probable cause panel.

Cook, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.