rejecting Jemo as controlling and finding that the board of elections properly dismissed election protest under Sharon Village
How later courts described this case
- rejecting Jemo as controlling and finding that the board of elections properly dismissed election protest under Sharon Village
- “a board of elections, like a board of revision, is a quasi-judicial body when it considers protests”
- “a board of elections * * * is a quasi-judicial body when it considers protests”
Written by the judges who cited it.
Distinguished
Distinguished by Gaul v. Bd., Pk. Com., Cleveland Metro., Unpublished Decision (6-8-2000) (2000)
Cooker Restaurant Corp. v. Montgomery County Bd. of Elections (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 302, that case is readily distinguishable from the case at hand.
The opinion
Cook, J.,
concurring. I concur in the judgment denying the writ of prohibition as to Brinker on the notice issue. As to Cooker and Meyer, I concur in the judgment denying the writ only on the basis of laches and concur with the analysis of that subject in the per curiam opinion.