noting that it is possible, yet still rare, for a patent and unambiguous lack of personal jurisdiction to warrant a writ of prohibition
How later courts described this case
- noting that it is possible, yet still rare, for a patent and unambiguous lack of personal jurisdiction to warrant a writ of prohibition
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ.,
dissent and would grant the writ because relator lacks sufficient minimum contacts with Ohio necessary to satisfy constitutional due process.