Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nass

65 Ohio St. 3d 160
602 N.E.2d 610
1992 Ohio LEXIS 2886

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Dec 9, 1992
Status: Published
On the bench: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by: 1 cases
Authority: More cited than 52.3%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur in the board’s findings and its recommendation. Respondent is, therefore, ordered suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of one year, but we suspend imposition of this sanction on the condition stated by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.