Frix

Opinion

State ex rel. Hurt v. Cox

  • 64 Ohio St. 3d 522
  • 597 N.E.2d 131
  • 1992 Ohio LEXIS 1915
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Sep 2, 1992
Status
Published
Author
Douglas
On the bench
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
1 cases

The opinion

Douglas, J.,

concurring. I concur with the judgment of the majority but for reasons other than those expressed by the majority. Having an allegedly “adequate remedy at law” is not a defense to a mandamus action filed pursuant to R.C. 149.43.

Sweeney and Resnick, JJ., concur in the foregoing concurring opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.