ineffective assistance of appellate counsel
How later courts described this case
- ineffective assistance of appellate counsel
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Per Curiam.
In In re Petition of Brown (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 222 , 551 N.E.2d 954 , and Manning v. Alexander (1990), 50 Ohio St.3d 127 , 553 N.E.2d 264 , we held that appeal, not habeas corpus, was the proper remedy to claim ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. In State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60 , 584 N.E.2d 1204 , we held at paragraph two of the syllabus:
“Claims of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel may be raised in an application for reconsideration in the court of appeals or in a direct appeal to the Supreme Court pursuant to Section 2(B)(2)(a)(iii), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution. * * *”
Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals based on Brown, Manning, and Mumahan, supra.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.