Opinion

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Lubitsky

  • 63 Ohio St. 3d 669
  • 590 N.E.2d 746
  • 1992 Ohio LEXIS 922
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
May 20, 1992
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, McCormac, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Tenth, Wright
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 60.7%

imposing a six-month suspension on an attorney who failed to escrow a retainer fee, failed to accurately account for a fee or return unused portions of the fee, and charged a clearly excessive fee

How later courts described this case

  • imposing a six-month suspension on an attorney who failed to escrow a retainer fee, failed to accurately account for a fee or return unused portions of the fee, and charged a clearly excessive fee

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the record, and concur in the findings and recommendations of the board. Respondent, Gerald S. Lubitsky, is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months, with reinstatement contingent upon his return of $8,500 to Samuel Geraldo. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, McCormac, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

John W. McCormac, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for Douglas, J.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.