Opinion

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Sanders

  • 62 Ohio St. 3d 1505
  • 583 N.E.2d 1317
  • 1992 Ohio LEXIS 3555
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Jan 23, 1992
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 58.3%

The opinion

The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline filed its Final Report with this court on August 30, 1991, recommending that the respondent, Daniel J. Sanders, Attorney Registration Number 0008953, be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(7)(b). Respondent filed objections to said Final Report, and this cause was considered by the court. On consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by this court, effective January 22, 1992, that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(23), relator, Toledo Bar Association, immediately begin monitoring respondent, Daniel J. Sanders, and that such monitoring continue until further order by this court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by this court, sua sponte, that before a determination is made on the merits of this case, this matter be remanded to relator, Toledo Bar Association; that respondent submit to an independent psychiatric evaluation at his expense; that said evaluation be conducted by a psychiatrist to be selected by the Toledo Bar Association; and that said psychiatric evaluation address respondent’s past and present psychiatric condition.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that after obtaining said psychiatric evaluation relator, Toledo Bar Association, shall file a written report with this court which shall include both a copy of the psychiatric evaluation and relator’s findings as to the amount of restitution respondent should make and to whom restitution should be made.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that before filing its report with this court relator shall consolidate all pending charges against respondent for consideration by this court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that notwithstanding the remand to relator, Toledo Bar Association, this court shall maintain continuing jurisdiction over this case, including jurisdiction to issue emergency or other orders, if warranted.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.