Opinion

Becker v. Shaull

62 Ohio St. 3d 480
584 N.E.2d 684

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Feb 12, 1992
Status: Published
Author: Douglas
On the bench: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Strausbaugh, Sweeney, Tenth, Wright
Cited by: 10 cases

finding no negligence per se when alleged violated statute, R.C. 5589.06, lacked the specificity required to impose negligence per se upon the finding of a violation

How later courts described this case

finding no negligence per se when alleged violated statute, R.C. 5589.06, lacked the specificity required to impose negligence per se upon the finding of a violation

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Douglas, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent. I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.