Opinion

In re Weems

  • 62 Ohio St. 3d 212
  • 580 N.E.2d 1096
  • 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2864
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 11, 1991
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s finding that Weems has not established his present eligibility for admission to the practice of law in Ohio. We also agree with the board’s recommendation. Accordingly, Weems’s application to retake the bar examination and his candidacy for admission to the practice of law are disapproved. Weems may apply no earlier than March 1, 1993 to retake the Ohio Bar Examination.

Order accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.