Opinion

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Herzberger

  • 58 Ohio St. 3d 175
  • 569 N.E.2d 487
  • 1991 Ohio LEXIS 695
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Mar 27, 1991
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Completion, Douglas, From, Holmes, Law, Months, Moyer, Pending, Period, Practice, Snick, Suspended, Sweeney, Wright, Year
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is, therefore, suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year, but this sanction is suspended on the condition that he successfully complete a two-year monitored probation period. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent and would suspend respondent from the practice of law for one year, with six months of that period suspended, pending his successful completion of a two-year monitored probation period.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.