Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Giegel

56 Ohio St. 3d 58
564 N.E.2d 84
1990 Ohio LEXIS 1719

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Dec 12, 1990
Status: Published
On the bench: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by: 2 cases
Authority: More cited than 86.6%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur with the board’s findings and recommendations. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. Moreover, the court admonishes respondent that in any application for reinstatement, the court will look for proof that respondent has resolved his alcohol abuse problems and made restitution to persons injured by his misconduct. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.