Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ressing

  • 53 Ohio St. 3d 265
  • 559 N.E.2d 1359
  • 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1045
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Sep 12, 1990
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 84.5%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Thus, we hereby publicly reprimand respondent for having violated DR 1-102(A)(6). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.