Opinion

In re Application of Stineman

  • 52 Ohio St. 3d 88
  • 556 N.E.2d 184
  • 1990 Ohio LEXIS 269
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Jun 27, 1990
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Douglas, Fourth, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Stephenson, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 47.5%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and its recommendation. Accordingly, applicant’s application for admission without examination is hereby denied. However, applicant is permitted to reapply for admission. He shall undergo further character and fitness examination and, if approved, be required to take the Ohio bar examination.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Stephenson, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Earl E. Stephenson, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting for Wright, J.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.