Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Freeman

  • 51 Ohio St. 3d 98
  • 554 N.E.2d 1320
  • 1990 Ohio LEXIS 225
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
May 23, 1990
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Snick, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 45.2%

ordering an attorney to make restitution to a client in the amount he agreed to pay in settlement of the client’s legal-malpractice action against him

How later courts described this case

  • ordering an attorney to make restitution to a client in the amount he agreed to pay in settlement of the client’s legal-malpractice action against him

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed this record, we agree that respondent violated DR 6-101(A)(3) and 1-102(A)(6). We also agree with the board’s recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months, but this sanction is suspended on the condition that he satisfactorily completes a two-year monitored probation period and complies with the five requirements enumerated in the panel’s opinion. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.