Opinion

Complaint of Residents of Struthers v. Ordinance No. 87-8482

  • 45 Ohio St. 3d 227
  • 543 N.E.2d 794
  • 1989 Ohio LEXIS 221
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Sep 6, 1989
Status
Published
Author
Douglas
On the bench
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
9 cases

The opinion

Douglas, J.,

concurring. Since the ordinance in question is clearly in violation of Section 5, Article XVIII of the Ohio Constitution, I would be inclined to dissent. However, appellants have not raised the issue and, therefore, it need not be confronted. Accordingly, I concur with Justice Sweeney’s well-reasoned opinion.

Wright, J., concurs in the foregoing concurring opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.