noting apellant's failure to explain how its stated objective would apply to its proposed classification
How later courts described this case
- noting apellant's failure to explain how its stated objective would apply to its proposed classification
- dissent, Wright, J., criticizing the majority’s failure to consider whether severed portion could stand alone
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Moyer, C.J.,
dissenting. I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding and opinion for the same reasons stated in my dissent and concurrence in State, ex rel. Doersam, v. Indus. Comm. (1988), 40 Ohio St. 3d 201 /204-205, 533 N.E. 2d 321, 325 .
Holmes, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.