Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bussinger

  • 44 Ohio St. 3d 145
  • 541 N.E.2d 609
  • 1989 Ohio LEXIS 160
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Jul 26, 1989
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 83.2%

failing to preserve the identity of funds and property of a client; conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation

How later courts described this case

  • failing to preserve the identity of funds and property of a client; conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur with the board’s findings and recommendation. Respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.