Opinion

State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. Lancaster

44 Ohio St. 3d 106
541 N.E.2d 64
1989 Ohio LEXIS 152

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Jul 12, 1989
Status: Published
Author: Douglas
On the bench: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by: 11 cases
Authority: More cited than 15.1%

The opinion

Douglas, J.,

concurring. I am pleased to see the majority of the court reverse itself and adopt the position *107 set forth in my concurrence (joined in by Justice Sweeney) in the original decision in these cases as reported in State, ex rel. Eaton Corp., v. Lancaster (1988), 40 Ohio St. 3d 404, 416-417 , 534 N.E. 2d 46, 58 . Obviously, I concur in the majority opinion,

Sweeney, J., concurs in the foregoing concurring opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.