Opinion

State ex rel. Rollins v. Board of Education

  • 40 Ohio St. 3d 123
  • 532 N.E.2d 1289
  • 1988 Ohio LEXIS 436
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 28, 1988
Status
Published
Author
Douglas
On the bench
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Only, Sweeney, Syllabus, Wright
Cited by
29 cases
Authority
More cited than 15.1%

enforcing a contractual provision that required teachers to receive a principal's recommendation to be eligible for a continuing contract

How later courts described this case

  • enforcing a contractual provision that required teachers to receive a principal's recommendation to be eligible for a continuing contract

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Douglas, J.,

concurring in part and dissenting in part. While I concur in the syllabus and much of the language used in the majority opinion, I dissent from the majority’s ultimate decision as it seems to be contrary to some of the persuasive language used in the opinion.

I would grant the writ for a continuing contract and, collaterally, call attention to parts of the majority decision in Rocky River v. State Emp. Relations Bd. (1988), 39 Ohio St. 3d 196 , 530 N.E. 2d 1 , which are clearly inapposite to portions of today’s majority opinion.

Sweeney, J., concurs in the foregoing opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.