Opinion

Oney v. Allen

  • 39 Ohio St. 3d 103
  • 529 N.E.2d 471
  • 15 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2147
  • 1988 Ohio LEXIS 322
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Oct 12, 1988
Status
Published
Author
Locher
On the bench
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
23 cases
Authority
More cited than 15.1%

“It is axiomatic that a court speaks through its docket and journals”

How later courts described this case

  • “It is axiomatic that a court speaks through its docket and journals”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Locher, J.,

concurring. I concur in the judgment of the majority. However, I also agree with Justice Douglas that this case presents the opportunity to overrule the erroneous decision in Embers Supper Club, Inc. v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co. (1984), 9 Ohio St. 3d 22 , 9 OBR115, 457 N.E. 2d 1164 , and that we should do so today.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.