Opinion

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Hartwell

  • 35 Ohio St. 3d 258
  • 520 N.E.2d 226
  • 1988 Ohio LEXIS 59
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Mar 16, 1988
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
6 cases
Authority
More cited than 77.9%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

This court finds that respondent violated the aforementioned Disciplinary Rules indicated by the board. Respondent’s conduct, particularly with respect to Count I, however, requires a more severe sanction than that recommended. Such conduct undermines the integrity of the judicial system. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.