Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Levin

  • 35 Ohio St. 3d 4
  • 517 N.E.2d 892
  • 1988 Ohio LEXIS 5
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Jan 6, 1988
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Only, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
5 cases
Authority
More cited than 79.6%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

This court finds that respondent committed the disciplinary violations identified by the board. Accordingly, this court adopts the board’s recommendations. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded for the misconduct found by the board in D.D. No. 86-22. It is further ordered that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the state of Ohio for the misconduct found by the board in D.D. No. 87-3. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Wright, J., concurs in judgment only.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.