Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McClellan

31 Ohio St. 3d 321
31 Ohio B. 596
511 N.E.2d 117
1987 Ohio LEXIS 337

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Jul 29, 1987
Status: Published
On the bench: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by: 0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

This court finds that respondent violated the aforemen *324 tioned Disciplinary Rules. The evidence in this case amply demonstrates a clear pattern of neglect and deceit. The result, as noted by the board, was severe prejudice to some of respondent’s clients. Accordingly, this court adopts the recommendation of the board and respondent is hereby ordered permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.