Opinion

Akron Bar Ass'n v. Conway

  • 31 Ohio St. 3d 318
  • 31 Ohio B. 594
  • 511 N.E.2d 395
  • 1987 Ohio LEXIS 336
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Jul 29, 1987
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent admits to the facts charged in the amended complaint and this court finds respondent to have violated DR 1-102(A)(1), (4) and (6), 6-101(A)(3) and 7-101(A)(2). Accordingly, this court accepts the recommendation of the board and hereby suspends the respondent from the practice of law for six months, to be followed by a one-year probation from the termination of the suspension period. Further, the court orders as a condition of the probation that respondent maintain current registration and pay applicable fees and penalties under Gov. Bar R. VI for the period September 1, 1985 through August 31, 1987, and September 1, 1987 through August 31, 1989, within sixty days of the date of this opinion.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.