Opinion

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Gruhler

  • 31 Ohio St. 3d 80
  • 31 Ohio B. 193
  • 508 N.E.2d 962
  • 1987 Ohio LEXIS 296
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Jun 17, 1987
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

It is clear from respondent’s actions concerning the matters specified on Counts I, III and IV of the complaint that respondent neglected legal matters entrusted to him. Moreover, by failing to take *83 depositions or file interrogatories in the case involved under Count III, the respondent clearly attempted to handle a legal matter without preparation adequate in the circumstances, a violation of DR 6-101(A)(2).

Accordingly, we adopt the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the board and hereby suspend respondent from the practice of law for an indefinite period.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.