Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kick

  • 28 Ohio St. 3d 91
  • 28 Ohio B. 187
  • 502 N.E.2d 640
  • 1986 Ohio LEXIS 800
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 24, 1986
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Celebrezze, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 72.9%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon a full review of this matter, this court finds that the respondent had violated DR 9-102(B), 3-101(B) and 1-102(A)(1). This court accepts the recommendation of the board and hereby orders that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law in the state of Ohio for a period of one year.

It is further ordered that the respondent be taxed the costs of these proceedings.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.