Opinion

City of Kettering v. State Employment Relations Board

  • 26 Ohio St. 3d 50
  • 26 Ohio B. 42
  • 496 N.E.2d 983
  • 1986 Ohio LEXIS 747
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Aug 20, 1986
Status
Published
Author
Wright
On the bench
Brown, Celebrezze, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
23 cases

holding that the maintenance of stable employment relations between police officers and their employers was a matter of statewide concern

How later courts described this case

  • holding that the maintenance of stable employment relations between police officers and their employers was a matter of statewide concern
  • also noting that prior to passage of the Act there had been over four hundred public employee work stoppages in Ohio between 1973 and 1980

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Wright, J.,

dissenting. While I respectfully dissent from the results reached by the majority on the facts of this case, I wish to stress the narrow basis of my reasons. Kettering’s position is persuasive because of its clear and overriding interest in controlling its police command officers, which, in my view, falls within Kettering’s powers of local self-government under Section 3, Article XVIII of the Ohio Constitution.

I believe that municipalities are entitled to deal directly with a limited number of command officers of its police force due to the necessarily paramilitary nature of such a municipal operation. To that extent today’s opinion is an incorrect result.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.